{"id":73689,"date":"2017-05-24T14:34:00","date_gmt":"2017-05-24T14:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/127.0.0.1:10081\/?p=73689 "},"modified":"2017-05-24T14:34:00","modified_gmt":"2017-05-24T14:34:00","slug":"73689-revision-v1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/?p=73689","title":{"rendered":"After Report on Killings of C.I.A. Sources, China Asserts Right to Defend Itself"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">&nbsp; May 23, 2017<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p><div>&nbsp;<\/div><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mzzg.org\/UploadCenter\/ArticlePics\/2017\/20\/201752323chinaspy1-articleLarge.jpg\" alt=\"201752323chinaspy1-articleLarge.jpg (600&#215;393)\" \/><br \/><div>&nbsp;<\/div>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Great Hall of the People in Beijing. A Foreign Ministry spokeswoman would not confirm or deny a New York Times report that for two years starting in 2010, China killed or imprisoned more than a dozen C.I.A. sources, crippling United States intelligence gathering there.<\/span><\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Aly Song\/Reuters<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Chinese government has the obligation to defend its national security and the legal authority to protect China&#8217;s interests, a government spokeswoman said on Monday, the first official response to a New York Times report on the dismantling of C.I.A. espionage operations in China.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying, speaking during a regularly scheduled news conference in Beijing, did not confirm or deny The Times&#8217;s report that for two years starting in 2010, more than a dozen C.I.A. sources were killed or imprisoned, crippling United States intelligence gathering in China.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-family: \u5b8b\u4f53; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">I am not aware of the details of that report,&#8221; Ms. Hua said, according to an official transcript. &#8220;But I can tell you that China&#8217;s national security organ is investigating and handling organizations, personnel and activities that endanger China&#8217;s national security and interests and fully perform its duty with the authorization by law.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-family: \u5b8b\u4f53; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">I do not want to say more about the normal performance of duty by the national security organ,&#8221; she added.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The Times&#8217;s article cited 10 former and current American officials who described a vast and damaging breach of intelligence-gathering efforts in China, the cause of which remains under debate.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Global Times, a stridently nationalist newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, criticized the article but also said China should be praised for its counterespionage efforts.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-family: \u5b8b\u4f53; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">If C.I.A. spying operations in China were crippled, the U.S. has nothing to be proud of,&#8221; it said in an editorial, which was carried in both its English- and Chinese-language editions. &#8220;But the N.Y.T. report portrayed the people that spied for the U.S. as innocents, but the Chinese national security forces as merciless.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">It added that the events reported should be considered &#8220;a sweeping victory&#8221; for China.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-family: \u5b8b\u4f53; font-size: 12pt;\">&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">If this article is telling the truth, we would like to applaud China&#8217;s anti-espionage activities,&#8221; said the unsigned editorial. &#8220;Not only was the C.I.A.&#8217;s spy network dismantled, but Washington had no idea what happened and which part of the spy network had gone wrong.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The commentary took issue with one specific detail of the story, saying the description of one C.I.A. source being shot in a courtyard was &#8220;purely fabricated.&#8221; Global Times did not offer any evidence for that assessment.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">On Monday, Ms. Hua also confirmed the arrest of six Japanese citizens in China who had been accused of endangering national security.<\/span><\/p>  <p>&nbsp;<\/p>  <p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Yoshihide Suga, the chief cabinet secretary of Japan, said on Monday that six men were detained in Shandong and Hainan Provinces, coastal areas that are home to Chinese Navy bases.<\/span><\/p>  <p><br \/><\/p>  <p><a href=\"  https:\/\/cn.nytimes.com\/china\/20170523\/china-cia-espionage-response\/en-us\/\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">For detail please visit here<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&lt;div&gt;The Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying, speaking during a regularly scheduled news conference in Beijing, did not confirm or deny The Times&amp;#8217;s report that for two years starting in 2010, more than a dozen C.I.A. sources were killed or imprisoned, crippling United States intelligence gathering in China.&lt;\/div&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73689","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ChinaHumanRights","et-doesnt-have-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73689","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73689"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73689\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73689"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73689"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73689"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}