{"id":77486,"date":"2017-10-08T14:07:00","date_gmt":"2017-10-08T14:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/127.0.0.1:10081\/?p=77486 "},"modified":"2017-10-08T14:07:00","modified_gmt":"2017-10-08T14:07:00","slug":"77486-revision-v1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/?p=77486","title":{"rendered":"Little-Known Chinese Lawyer Disbarred for Defending Freedom of Speech"},"content":{"rendered":"

October 3, 2017<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

 <\/div>\"2017106zhu-shengwu_e58d95e4baba.jpeg
 <\/div>

ZHU SHENGWU<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Early in September the Justice Department of Shandong province notified Zhu Shengwu (<\/span>\u795d\u5723\u6b66<\/span>), a 36-year-old lawyer in Jinan, the provincial capital, that his <\/span>“<\/span>anti-Communist Party, anti-socialism<\/span>”<\/span> expressions online had <\/span>“<\/span>threatened national security,<\/span>”<\/span> and he was disbarred. Mr. Zhu requested a public hearing.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Zhu Shengwu heads the Shandong Xinchang Law Firm (<\/span>\u5c71\u4e1c\u4fe1\u5e38\u5f8b\u5e08\u4e8b\u52a1\u6240<\/span>) which he founded about a year ago. He has been practicing for only five years, specializing in intellectual property rights, particularly online copyright disputes. Beginning this year, however, he began taking on so-called <\/span>“<\/span>sensitive cases<\/span>”<\/span> –<\/span> i.e., involving human rights. Among others, he represented Wang Jiangfeng (<\/span>\u738b\u6c5f\u5cf0<\/span>), a man from Shandong who was found guilty of <\/span>“<\/span>picking quarrels and provoking trouble<\/span>”<\/span> and sentenced to two years in prison last April for calling the current Chinese leader Xi Jinping “Steamed Bun Xi,” and the late Mao Zedong “Demon Mao” in online chat rooms. Zhu believes that his defense of Wang — in which he made a “systematic, thorough and determined defense of freedom of expression” — is the real motive for his punishment.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Apart from defending his clients, Zhu began exercising his own freedom of expression on Weibo, which he began using in March. The account, with around 2,000 followers, was shut down in August. On it, Zhu had described China’s judicial system as “a meat grinder that churns out wrongful convictions,” and said that “China is ruled through terror and lies.” He also mocked the talks he had been summoned to with Justice Bureau officials.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

In the Chinese system, Justice Departments or bureaus at different levels of the governments have an office whose job it is to “regulate lawyers,” and it uses annual reviews — in which licenses can be suspended or revoked — as a way to rein them in. For human rights lawyers, the annual review is a Damoclean sword hanging over their heads, and some of China’s bravest and best known human rights lawyers have had their licenses revoked over the years.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

One of the Justice Department officials in Shandong asked Zhu Shengwu repeatedly whether he’d like to keep his license. Zhu replied: “All I’ve done is represent a sensitive case, write a defense systematically arguing for freedom of speech, and voice a bit of political criticism. For that you are going to revoke my license. Who’d dare keep a license like that?”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

While the Lawyers’ Associations across the China are supposedly professional organizations looking out for the interests of their members, in reality they are designed to ensure that lawyers fall in line with the government and the Communist Party (indeed a large number of China’s 300,000 lawyers are Party members). The Lawyers’ Association functions like other mass organizations for what would otherwise be independent individuals or groups, including the Writers’ Associations for writers, or the Three-Self Patriotic Movement for Protestant Christians. So it is no surprise that, on September 8, the chairman of the Lawyers<\/span>’<\/span> Association of Shandong Province, a man named Su Bo (<\/span>\u82cf\u6ce2<\/span>), issued an angry statement on China<\/span>’<\/span>s popular social media WeChat denouncing Zhu Shengwu, and voicing support for the actions taken by the Party “after Zhu refused to repent and correct his wrongdoings.”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

“<\/span>I don<\/span>’<\/span>t know about lawyer Zhu Shengwu,<\/span>”<\/span> one of China<\/span>’<\/span>s most famous human rights lawyers Pu Zhiqiang (<\/span>\u6d66\u5fd7\u5f3a<\/span>) wrote, who was himself sentenced to three years in prison with a three-year reprieve for his activities and expressions, and whose license was revoked by Beijing Justice Bureau last year. “But Su Bo was a schoolmate of mine at the Chinese University of Political Science and Law. On the morning of April 27, 1989, we students gathered at the university gate, undecided as to whether we should to go out and protest.” The President and department chairs tried to stop the students. “I remember the sky was shaking and the air seemed to be on fire. Su Bo, shouldering a large sign with China’s Constitution written all over it, was at the forefront of the student procession. I heard him roaring, his voice hoarse: ‘If not today, when? Are we going to tolerate it forever?’ He was all sound and fury then. Twenty-eight years later, I appreciate this statement for giving me information about his whereabouts and achievements.”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Another well-known human rights lawyer, Sui Muqing (<\/span>\u968b\u7267\u9752<\/span>), also recognized the chairman of the Shandong Lawyers<\/span>’<\/span> Association, his classmate twenty-eight years ago. <\/span>“<\/span>He gave an inspiring speech in front of us all before the big protest procession on April 27, 1989. And I was so impressed, because I too wanted to speak to the crowd but when I got the mic, I was overcome by shyness and passed it on.”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Sui Muqing, who was held in secret detention from July 11, 2015, to January 6, 2016 as part of the 709 crackdown, offered to represent Zhu Shengwu at the hearing.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

The hearing to revoke Zhu Shengwu’s license “for allegedly making expressions that threatened national security” was held on September 21. Even though a hearing is a public event, it was filled with people sent by the Shandong Justice Department….to fill the spots. Zhu’s friends were stopped outside.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

The hearing went on for three hours. Zhu and his two lawyers were allowed to speak, and they mounted a vigorous defense, questioning the authority of the Justice Department and the Lawyers’ Association to censor a lawyer for his private expressions. They disputed the preposterous notion of speech being a “national security threat,” and gave a rousing defense of freedom of expression.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

The next day, on September 22, the Justice Department of Shandong province issued a decision to revoke Zhu Shengwu<\/span>’<\/span>s license to practice law. <\/span>“<\/span>Upon investigation: Since March 2017, lawyer Zhu Shengwu frequently posted on his Sina Weibo account <\/span>‘\u795d\u5723\u6b66\u5f8b\u5e08<\/span>18668936828’<\/span> expressions that negate the fundamental political system and principles established by our country’s Constitution, made insinuations against the socialist system, and used the internet to instigate dissatisfaction with the Party and government, resulting in egregious social effects. [His behaviors] seriously damaged the image of the legal profession.”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Zhu Shengwu and his lawyers will appeal the decision through administrative review, and if necessary, bring administrative litigation against the Justice Department of Shandong province. But it will likely to be a resistance in the court of public opinion, because the law does not rule in China.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

In a self-introduction, Zhu said he grew up in a faraway mountainous village in Hunan; he was the first in his village to go to college and the first to gain a graduate degree. He studied law at Shandong University and has never been the subject of complaints by clients or peers.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

I was asked the other day whether, after the 709 Crackdown, the pressure on human rights lawyers will abate. First of all, the 709 Crackdown isn<\/span>’<\/span>t over. Wu Gan (<\/span>\u5434\u6de6<\/span>), Wang Quanzhang (<\/span>\u738b\u5168\u748b<\/span>), and Jiang Tianyong (<\/span>\u6c5f\u5929\u52c7<\/span>) are still in custody. Wang Quanzhang has been held incommunicado for over 800 days. It is possible that Wang has been tortured to the point of disability — this is one of the few explanations as to why he still hasn’t been allowed to see his lawyers. Those who have been relieved on bail or on reprieve have been under surveillance and regularly threatened to keep silent about their experiences while they were in secret detention. National TV stations had human rights lawyers on camera confessing that their defense of human rights was illegal, and that they had been brainwashed by “Western concepts of human rights and the rule of law.” Probably because the government really didn’t benefit from the 709 crackdown, in recent months and weeks, it has been employing softer but still insidious tactics to corner human rights lawyers: denying their annual renewals, reviewing the accounts of law firms, forcing some lawyers out of their jobs, and in Zhu Shengwu’s case revoking his license altogether.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

“<\/span>Did you see Su Bo at the hearing?” I asked lawyer Sui Muqing.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

“<\/span>No, he was not in the room,” he said. “But I ran into him during the break. He praised my defense. I asked how he knew. He said someone told him. I think high-level officials of the Justice Department, and Su Bo himself, were in an adjacent room watching the video feed.”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

“<\/span>What else did you say to him?”<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>

Lawyer Sui Muqing made no response.<\/span><\/p>

 <\/p>


<\/p>

For detail please visit here<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<div>Zhu Shengwu heads the Shandong Xinchang Law Firm (\u5c71\u4e1c\u4fe1\u5e38\u5f8b\u5e08\u4e8b\u52a1\u6240) which he founded about a year ago. He has been practicing for only five years, specializing in intellectual property rights, particularly online copyright disputes. Beginning this year, however, he began taking on so-called &#8220;sensitive cases&#8221; &#8211; i.e., involving human rights. Among others, he represented Wang Jiangfeng (\u738b\u6c5f\u5cf0), a man from Shandong who was found guilty of &#8220;picking quarrels and provoking trouble&#8221; and sentenced to two years in prison last April for calling the current Chinese leader Xi Jinping &#8220;Steamed Bun Xi,&#8221; and the late Mao Zedong &#8220;Demon Mao&#8221; in online chat rooms.<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77486","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ChinaHumanRights","et-doesnt-have-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77486","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=77486"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77486\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=77486"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=77486"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/minzhuzhongguo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=77486"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}